Register

Welcome to the Political Forum - Debate Politics Forum.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed.

Results 1 to 5 of 5

Threaded View

  1. #1
    Forum Owner Heir to the Throne
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    4,179

    Democrats poised to lose the Senate in 2012

    This is mostly my conjecture. I've based it on facts, recent elections and some of the things I've read.

    As of now, there are 53 Democratic/Democratic-caucusing Senators. In 2012, there will be 23 Democratic and 10 Republican Senate seats up for grabs. In addition, many of the Democrats are in red states. Here's how I see the probabilities:

    Democrats certain to lose

    Kent Conrads old seat after he retired
    Ben Nelson of Nebraska

    Democrats likely to lose

    John Tester of Montana
    Claire McCaskill of Missouri

    Democrats in trouble

    Debbie Stabenow of Michigan

    Democrats in Tossup Races

    Bill Nelson of Florida
    Sherrod Brown of Ohio

    Republicans in Trouble

    John Ensign of Nevada (although he could get taken out in a Republican primary anyway)



    I'd have to do some research on how Tester is faring, but for now I think that he and McCaskill are in trouble and likely to lose. I think it will be hard for McCaskill and Tester to run away from their votes on the stimulus, the bailouts and healthcare. They may not get away, and thus they may get taken down in those red states. So, not counting tossups, Dems are -4, which puts them at 49 seats against 51 Republicans. Democrats will need to face low quality Tea Party candidates like Sharron Angle and Christine O'Donnell in order to be competitive. This could help Democrats a lot in all of these races in addition to Tea Partiers launching primary campaigns against established Republicans in Maine (Olympia Snowe) and Indiana (Dick Lugar). For the record, while many of the GOP Senators are scumbags, I think it is somewhat tragic that in order for Democrats to keep control of the Senate, respectable senators like Lugar would have to be defeated.

    We could be looking at a second Bill Clinton scenario of 1996 with a Democrat in the White House and Republicans owning the Congress, or with a very low chance, the Democrats could take the House back, but not the Senate, or the Republicans could run the whole board and take everything back.

    The Democrats taking back the House could be unlikely though, as Obama's support among working class whites and independents may have dipped too low for another wave election.
    Last edited by W.E.B. Du Bois; 02-05-2011 at 06:15 PM.
    Read the Forum Rules

    "When I entered Republican politics during an earlier period of malaise, in the late seventies and early eighties, the movement got most of the big questions -- crime, inflation, the Cold War -- right. This time, the party is getting the big questions disastrously wrong."

    "In the aftershock of 2008, large numbers of Americans feel exploited and abused. Rather than workable solutions, my party is offering low taxes for the currently rich and high spending for the currently old, to be followed by who-knows-what and who-the-hell-cares. This isn't conservatism; it's a going-out-of-business sale for the baby-boom generation."


    - David Frum, former speech writer for George W. Bush

    "This is just ridiculous. I never thought as an economist I would have to spend so much time doing political analysis."

    - Diane Swonk, chief economist at Mesirow Financial

 

 

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Back to Top