Your source is an anonymous source. Your first post on this thread is from ABC and in it you write: "According to the video news report which accompanies that article, Trayvon Martin's autopsy results revealed that he had bruised and bloodied knuckles and hands, the skin was broken, etc." The source for this statement is an anonymous source. Thus in the context here, your source is an anonymous source.
With regards to WFTV, it should be noted that the language of the article implies an anonymous source and I did not see any explicit statement to this effect: the autopsy report released to the public says....
The wording should be noted from the WFTV article: "WFTV has learned that the medical examiner found two injuries on Martin’s body."
Why not strike "WFTV has learned"? and simply say "the medical examiner found two injuries on Martin's body"? Anonymous source.
I think it's obvious that GZ racially profiled TM. Black guy walks into the neighborhood and GZ starts following him. Race is obviously one of the biggest factors by which people always judge one another, and the use of racial profiling is extremely common, if not in constant use by everyone at all times. I highly doubt TM was behaving in any way that indicated drug use. With regards to the THC in blood, THC can stay in the blood for days after smoking marijuana. GZ saw a black male wearing a hoodie, and in his neighborhood there had been several people matching that profile who had broken into homes, GZ racially profiled TM and started following him. Pretty simple, pretty obvious.
The sword cuts both ways. She was dispassionate enough that she didn't even bother to get involved in the case until someone sought her testimony out. Had she been so biased and romantically involved with TM, she would have immediately gone to the press and not only told her story but she would have made it out to be far worse and told it with far more certainty than she has. Instead of heard "a little bit...get off, get off" it would have been "I definitely heard GZ yell I'm tired of you punks coming through here! and TZ saying don't touch me!"
That GZ is a racist does not necessarily make him guilty. The question for the jury will be if he started this whole thing off by shoving TM, which is how I think he would have done it if he had done it.
Here's more on GZ's racism by the way: http://thinkprogress.org/justice/201...kes/?mobile=nc
This is from a full-grown man and there's no excuse for it. It's clear cut racist bullying.
Anyway, that's just a sidebar. The real question is who pushed who first. I would be looking for more information from ballistics to try to discern what angle the shot was fired from.
From a legal view, according to the Stand Your Ground Law, it might also be possible to say that if TM started beating on GZ that therefore GZ had legal cover to shoot him. From a moral view, this assumption could be questioned, and from the view of would this be legal in any other state besides Florida?
WEB




Reply With Quote
