Register

Welcome to the Political Forum - Debate Politics Forum.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed.

Results 1 to 2 of 2
  1. #1
    Forum Owner Heir to the Throne
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    4,179

    Logically, Richard Dawkins Is an Idiot

    Richard Dawkins, big time atheist, and a bunch of other atheists held a rally in Washington DC over the weekend not only espousing atheism, but advocating for the trashing of other religions.

    I think atheists should be treated with respect and atheism should be treated with respect. By that same logic, this implies that religious folks and religion should be treated with respect. Most atheists would want atheism and atheists treated with respect, so there it is hypocrisy for them to say things like: "I don't despise religious people. I despise what they stand for" and atheists must "ridicule and show contempt" for the doctrines and sacraments of religious people. Those are lines uttered by Dawkins.

    Let's put the shoe on the other foot.

    I don't despise atheists. I despise what they stand for.
    We must ridicule and show contempt for the beliefs of atheists.


    Makes atheists and agnostics shudder, right? So then how's it OK when those same statements are said about religious people. Logically, it's not and therefore logically Dawkins is an idiot.

    ----------

    Now I'm going to go on to address something I heard on NPR: the subject of being an in-the-closet atheist. I think it would be tough to be an atheist in a lot of parts of the country (i.e. the South, the Prairie States, heartland states, and rural areas). It would be hard to start an atheist club. People who tried would probably be ostracized by the most of their class and publicly ridiculed and disrespected (which should be OK by the Richard Dawkins standard).

    There should be mutual tolerance by both atheists and believers, and I think that believers are actually the ones who would have the hardest time abiding by that. I think believers are far more motivated to get converts (and thus less tolerant of open atheism) than atheists are to get converts (and thus more tolerant of open religiosity).

    Also, I do not support an in-your-face atheism. I think a somewhat in-the-closet approach is more appropriate. Atheists should not go out of their way to announce their atheism, especially to family. Atheists should be discreet and just don't go to church, temple or the mosque. They should not get on a bullhorn and say: "I'm an atheist!" I guess it's the kind of stand of restraint and civility I favor. The above makes as much sense to me as getting on a bullhorn and saying "I'm a Democrat!" "I'm a Republican!" "I'm a Christian!" "I am a Harry Potter fan!" That's nice; now shut the fuck up, you're annoying me.


    WEB
    Last edited by W.E.B. Du Bois; 03-25-2012 at 01:20 AM.
    Read the Forum Rules

    "When I entered Republican politics during an earlier period of malaise, in the late seventies and early eighties, the movement got most of the big questions -- crime, inflation, the Cold War -- right. This time, the party is getting the big questions disastrously wrong."

    "In the aftershock of 2008, large numbers of Americans feel exploited and abused. Rather than workable solutions, my party is offering low taxes for the currently rich and high spending for the currently old, to be followed by who-knows-what and who-the-hell-cares. This isn't conservatism; it's a going-out-of-business sale for the baby-boom generation."


    - David Frum, former speech writer for George W. Bush

    "This is just ridiculous. I never thought as an economist I would have to spend so much time doing political analysis."

    - Diane Swonk, chief economist at Mesirow Financial

  2. #2
    Banned Knight
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    384
    I agree one hundred percent, pretty much all the things you've mentioned in this thread are reasons why I also believe Dawkins is an idiot. An arrogant idiot. Not because he's an atheist, but because of the hypocrisy surrounding his atheist views and how he likes to trash on religion all the time. I have no qualms with atheists, but I think--just like Christians and other people of faith--they should avoid stooping to a level of insulting the faith or views of those who see things differently on a wide scale.

 

 

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Back to Top