Fairly Obvious Forum Rules Violations

[Echo]

W.E.B. Du Bois

I don't deny my country's sins. Sure, Russia did many evil things in the past.

But for you to be so righteous and indignant on here is hillarious. I am sorry, compared to the European colonial empires, Russia's empire was puny. You French raped Vietnam, Algeria, hell, much of North Africa. You and the British persecuted for centuries the Native people in Canada. You even invaded us, too. Burned Moscow. Only second time that happened. First were the Mongols. No enemy could enter the capital since then. Your people are just as bad as mine, Du Bois.


I think it's interesting how hard you come down on the "children" or murderers and slavers, since that is exactly what a lot of people would describe Russians as (i.e. Ukrainians, Chechens, Afghanis, Chinese, Polish, Germans and I presume the people of Kazakhstan). Do you also consider Russians to be "children" of murderers?

Ukrainians, probably not. At least, MOST, not. Only the Western ones. There was a lot of horrible stuff there. A lot of reason for them to not like us, and us -> them.

Chinese? What have we ever done to them? :) We are best friends now. All the border disputes have long been settled.

Afghans, yes. That was a stupid thing to do.

Germans? They invaed and murdered us, as I recall, not the other way around.

Kazakhs, yeah, we chased them off their best farmland. Many startved in the deserts. They have a right to hate us. Most don't though. Too good a people for that.

Hey, Du Bois, your country is ethnically cleansing people as we speak. Mass deportations of Tatars from Crimea? What of mass deportations of Roma from France? And, you know
what, I don't care if they are illegal immigrants, not that they are, since EU citizens have a right to move freely through the continent, in case you were not aware; your government is treating them exactly the same way as Stalin did Crimean Tatars, Romanians in Bessarabia, Germans in West Prussia (Kaliningrad now), West Ukrainians, etc. You are no better than us. Sarkozy is a pathetic, racist piece of shit, persecuting a defenseless minority. Get off your high horse, Du Bois. We are in the same boat. Both our countries are dirty as hell.

---------------------------

Admin WEB Reply:

So you are directly attacking me as righteous, indignant and on a high horse? Looks like you are ignoring the forum rules:

3 Do not even talk about other posters on the forum. You may talk about what they SAY, their REASONING, LOGIC and whether or not they have PROOF. You may not talk about them at all. In other words, attack the message, not the messenger. You may not say a poster is misguided, naiive, hateful, biased, ignorant, etc. You may attack THEIR COMMNENTS AND ARGUMENTS, but not them. You may say that their argument is flawed, makes no sense, is not based on facts, etc. If a person starts talking about themself in a passing way (i.e. "I consider myself a fair person."), this is not an opportunity to argue that they are the topic and then trash them.

I'm suspending your posting privileges for 3 days.

[TheSilverEagle]

Silver Eagle,

I would like to know why you think it is appropriate to use Adolf Hitler as someone to quote for your signature. Generally, a person's signature represents who they are in some way, shape or form. Do you admire Adolf Hitler? Do you think he was right about some things? If so, what?

Oh, and is it safe to assume that this is the Silver Eagle that your name comes from?

http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_ElQ6uj_xmu0/S9S7TSxwyLI/AAAAAAAABgo/rfSiiNzLe1M/s1600/nazi_eagle.jpg


WEB


Intent focus on familiar words related to phrases, skipping the profile.

My signature doe's not represent who I am but gives a meaning or stresses
an idea which some use for. The irony of the quote is the man who made History
points out it's significance yet during the break of the pact seems to overlook
it as he sends his troops up until Stalingrad. You must be aware of the surface
of World War ll or at least maybe two feet below water of it to know this part do
you not? So I am to assume that every person with their own signature is the
reflection of it's quoter? Obviously not.


The Silver Eagle derives not only from the Third Reich but from a used symbol of
the Roman Empire as well, although it is well known as a double-headed eagle
which was used. This eagle has been throughout History used with many different
interpreted meanings and is now currently used as the American emblem and can
be found on our U.S money which I refer Silver from the twenty-five cent quarter
which displays a "silver eagle."

My Username means many things and is not like a signature but reflects my take
towards open History, all of History to be respected, not particular sections
overlooked or just the importance of one cultures History such as black history
for instance. The Silver Eagle has been used and represented and even mention
throughout history and is a familiar term that comes to mind when seen or heard.
Silver Eagle refers specifically in America to the Bald Eagle which in native tribes
brings or delivers peace.

Stereotypical indeed and quick to assume. So is this the current generation
W.E.B Du Bois who takes racism over the edge seriously and has full support
for NAACP to ban anything offensive or insensitive towards anyone the very
opposite point of Bois? Or do you admire his work or have constructive criticism
for a particular idea?

Intent to profile my usage of History as being Neo-Nazi tells me you jump to
conclusions very quickly. No I am not an admirer of Adolf Hitler but simply an
admirer of History. Are you admirer to the idea that anyone who simply says
or doe's something that seems racist is racist?

You now answered number two of Mikes question. Guten Tag Herr.


-------------------------------

Admin WEB Reply:

You are banned. The basic reason is that you appear to support Nazism, you dodged my questions: Do you admire Adolf Hitler? Do you think he was right about some things? If so, what?, and instead of answering those questions, focused your comments on making personal attacks on me. This simply reinforces the appearance that you support Nazism (which is against forum rules). Your diversion from answering the question (attacking me) is also against forum rules. Try to grasp that, if a "surface" statement is not to difficult for you to comprehend.

I will return to point out your dodging and insults later, if I feel it is warranted.

[wooddshed]

Yeah it makes sense to me too, but unlike most of the Arab nations around Israel, I don't see Israel denying anyone's right to exist. Their creed and holy books don't specifically call for the killing of another group based on race or religion.

With all due respect, your living in a dream world mate. Israelis have set out to cleanse palestine/israel of arabs for the last 62 years. U.S Israel control of middle east is all that's on the agenda and we all know it. Stop kidding yourself.

---------------

Admin WEB Reply:

With all due respect, you've violated forum rule 1: don't talk about other members. You are banned.

[W.E.B. Du Bois]

Socialism did not work real well for the Soviets.

China on the other hand are now Capitalist in reality.

The word socialism is deliberately misused by many conservatives. Everything from Bill Clinton, to Tony Blair, to Nikolas Sarkozy, to Hu Jintao to Lenin is called socialism. How can that word mean anything when it is used to describe things which are completely different? It's like saying that the US, France, Libya, China, Iran and North Korea are all representative governments. If that were true, then the term "representative governments" has no meaning since what is being described are completely different from each other based on the criteria that is being discussed.

[Loud American]

what about went the payroll tax has to be returned? Hasn't anyone noticed these stunts?
REMEMBER THE $8,000.00 home buyer break? the one which had to be paid back the next year?

How about the stimulus check and how it was part of the taxable income the next year?

Too many people talk off the cuff - squawking like parrots in a pot! ... just like the ObamaCare con job which less than a year later one of the primary PRO supports was dishing out waivers - yeah ... Pelosi

People can't be THAT STUPID - it has to be treason!

[independentlogic]

I disagree with that. Giving aid to Pakistan is the only reason Pakistan allows the US it's ability to re-supply its troops in Afghanistan as well as to conduct air strikes and raids on Al Qaeda. If Pakistan were to fall to a radical Islammist group that would really give the conservative blogosphere and Fox News something to have a heart attack about. Then they'll wish we had given billions to Pakistan and of course it will be too late.

What foolish thinking. First, Pakistan is not an ally. Not now, not before. Just like Iraq or Saudi Arabia. We would be better off tightening security at home and increasing our intel / SOFs. Or do you think it was a coincidence that OBL was living next to the Paki military for YEARS? Yeah okay...

---------------------

Admin WEB Reply:

The "foolish thinking" comment is a violation of the forum rule prohibiting indirect insults - you are banned. Furthermore, you are an idiot for trying to make the situation into black or white (ally or not ally) when the situation is far more complicated.

[user9000]

It's been fun, but I can't see this forum as being up to what I was looking for, so I am outta here, especially before you bully me out of here... Good Bye

--------------------

Admin WEB Reply:

By saying that I bully you, you are talking about me and thus in violation of forum rule 1: no talking about other forum members. You are banned. Your claim about me bullying is also very cowardly, since you have no problem picking fights by calling me biased, but when I criticize your opinions you cry and run. Your yellow-bellied personality won't be missed.

[007]

Where is the contradiction?
Are you here to debate or to simply attack everything that others post?
They served in ww2 in elite russian units, the units were well established prior to ww2
And continued post war.
Part of the USSR philosophy of equality of the sexes.
Military tacticians and educators have noted the existence of these units.
Historians have documented their abilities.

Why is a woman a better sniper at short distance and with a standard caliber rifle( not a 50 cal)?
I don't know, little research exists into the how's and whys.
The actuality however, is well documented and often mentioned at the british army sniper training center in Wales.

Expecting vicious and attacking reply with baited breath.


-----------------------------------

Site Owner Reply:

I think you have some mild mental problems. I merely said that your proof contradicted your opinion, to post my exact quote: "The proof you offer for your comment (women serving in elite units for a few years) appears to contradict your claim that women have been serving on front lines for decades."

Link: http://politicalforum.net/showthread.php?3752-Should-Women-Serve-on-Frontline-Infantry-Positions&p=8932&viewfull=1#post8932

You respond by going ape shit. You clearly are extremely sensitive to criticism.

You also were rather stupid not to have read the forum rules, which were sent to you by a moderator. Your comment clearly breaks the forum rule not to talk about other members.

A normal person would have replied either by disagreeing with what I wrote or questioning the logic behind it. Even denouncing what I wrote as nonsensical, irrational, false, etc is within the forum rules. What is not allowed is talking about other members as you would know if you were an adult and you actually conducted yourself in accord with the rules you agreed to by joining this forum.

You are banned, and judging by your extreme over-sensitivity, you are going to have an extremely rough go of it on any forum or blog you join.

[Jack Fate]

Having watched one of Bells' videos on YouTube, read up about Critical Race Theory on different websites that appear credible, I find your comments to be disgusting and a partisan attack on President Obama. There only appears to be two basis for the right wing attack (including your attack) on Obama via Bell: Obama is a Democrat and he is black.

The fact that the link you provided goes to a right wing blog which also misrepresents the very contents they post in their blog again shows that the intention of many of those on the right who write about this and talk about this, is merely to lie and to use racism and racial division to beat Obama and empower themselves, much as they have been doing for the past 50 years.

For those who are interested, here are the links I checked out:


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qnYM1ZqaKVw

http://spacrs.wordpress.com/what-is-critical-race-theory/

http://professorderrickbell.com/scholarship/

I will probably read and watch more later and will post more later as well.

Idiocy. Are you going to tell me Black conservatives disagree with Obama because he is Black? Think before you speak.

-----------------------------------------------

Reply From Admin W.E.B.

The idiocy is yours. I come with facts and reasons; you with insults and forum rules violations.

You are banned.

[W.E.B. Du Bois]

This is a thread for storing and displaying fairly obvious forum rules violations.